Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos, centers on this debate between these two philosophical adversaries. In his book Gordon examines the background of the debate. Heidegger and/or Cassirer at Davos. GEOFFREY WAITE. Cornell University. There was a famous discussion between Heidegger and Ernst Cassirer in Davos . In Ernst Cassirer and Martin Heidegger participated in a momentous debate in Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos, centers on this debate between these two.
|Published (Last):||24 October 2010|
|PDF File Size:||5.69 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||4.66 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
They also contained a few swipes at Heidegger whom Cassirer sought subtly to connect to the anthropological tradition. Views Read Edit View history.
Gordon is well aware of the decisive role of Heidegger in twentieth-century philosophy. Here is, advos, a place to disagree with Gordon’s assessment. At the core of their debate at Davos and, it turns out, at the core of their entire philosophical thought lay, as Gordon puts it, “a fundamental contest between two normative images of humanity,” p.
What is human finitude? Existential modes of philosophizing due to Kierkegaard and Nietzsche were at the same time making themselves increasingly felt; philosophical anthropology pointed philosophy in a new direction; and finally there was Edmund Husserl and his school.
Continental Divide: Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos – Wikipedia
Attempts to revive his fortunes are, I am afraid, doomed to failure. Heidegger agreed that “In this question of the going-beyond of finitude, there lies a quite central problem. German philosophy, he argues, saw itself at this moment in a state of crisis that reflected the political and intellectual uncertainties of the period.
Through a close and painstaking analysis, Gordon dissects the exchange itself to reveal that it was at core a philosophical disagreement cassirre what it means to be human. Email required Address never made public. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Continental Divide — Peter E. Gordon | Harvard University Press
Heidegger’s Being and Time, which had put him at the center of German philosophy inreadily incorporated all these new forces. These are certainly important categories for characterizing Cassirer’s and Heidegger’s work. Heidegger’s provocative thesis was also to form the basis of the debate between him and Cassirer, which was the recognized high point of the entire seminar sessions at Davos.
Soon the fertile German-Jewish symbiosis was to come czssirer an end. The Cassirer—Heidegger debate is an encounter between Martin Heidegger and Ernst Cassirer in March in DavosSwitzerland  concerning the significance of Kantian notions of freedom and rationality. Gordon is right in treating the Davos debate in this way as a pivotal moment. Through a close and painstaking analysis, Gordon dissects the exchange itself to reveal that it was at core a philosophical disagreement over what it means to be human.
Gordon’s second chapter describes the setting of Cassirer’s and Heidegger’s debate. As Gordon explains, the Davos debate csasirer continue to both inspire and provoke well after the two men had gone their separate ways. Cassirer argues that while Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason emphasizes human temporality and finitude, he also sought to situate human cognition within a broader conception of cxssirer.
Gordon dissects the content of that debate in his fourth and longest chapter in a rich and skillful analysis. Gordon reconstructs the debate between Heidegger and Cassirfr, demonstrating its significance as a point of rupture in Continental thought that implicated all the major philosophical movements of the day.
The event was attended by a large academic audience that included both Emmanuel Levinas and Rudolf Carnap. The inspiration for this book had come from a short piece Rosenzweig had written on a momentous philosophical debate between Heidegger and his colleague Ernst Cassirer that had taken place at Davos, Switzerland, in in front of a large international audience. Join Our Mailing List: Where neo-Kantian Cassirer saw human beings as gifted with a capacity for “spontaneous self-expression” and thus endowed with “a complete freedom” to create worlds of meaning, Heidegger envisaged them to be determined by their “finitude” and thus as living in the midst of conditions they have not created and cannot hope to control.
This page was last edited on 18 Decemberat Gordon’s book presents us with a paradigm of what intellectual history should look like. Their disagreement can be understood only if we appreciate their common point of departure as thinkers of the German interwar crisis, an era of rebellion that touched all of the major philosophical movements of the day—life-philosophy, philosophical anthropology, neo-Kantianism, phenomenology, heidegger existentialism.
Edward Lear is an apt character to think about at Christmas-time. Cassirer questioned whether Heidegger, with his belief in human finitude, could have any place for non-relative truth and objective knowledge.
Cassirer, with more difficulty, also strove to accommodate these new energies by turning Kant’s epistemology into a historically and ethnologically oriented philosophy of symbolic forms. His nonsense books, mo …. Our recent titles are available via Edelweiss. As Gordon explains, the Davos debate would continue to both inspire and provoke well after the two men had gone their separate ways. Heidegger, on the heideggerr hand, compromised himself in by becoming the first Nazi rector of Freiburg University.
It remains, even today, a touchstone of philosophical memory.
But Gordon also shows how the life and work of these two philosophers remained closely intertwined. Cool, controlled, assured in its grasp of the historical sources, exhilarating in its analytic skills, the book highlights a whole and important epoch in intellectual history while focusing on a single, hwidegger facet.
Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos
In his last chapter, Gordon reviews the mythology that has grown up around the event. But Gordon also shows how the life and work of these two philosophers heidegged closely intertwined. Heidegger, Cassirer, Davosdeals directly with this encounter — with its content, its setting, its antecedents, consequences, and implications.